{"id":3772,"date":"2022-10-21T12:28:22","date_gmt":"2022-10-21T10:28:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/staging.mediaire.ai\/?p=3772"},"modified":"2025-09-03T09:11:42","modified_gmt":"2025-09-03T07:11:42","slug":"latest-artificial-intelligence-provides-fast-accurate-and-consistent-detection-of-multiple-sclerosis-lesions-clinical-neuroradiology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/latest-artificial-intelligence-provides-fast-accurate-and-consistent-detection-of-multiple-sclerosis-lesions-clinical-neuroradiology\/","title":{"rendered":"Latest Artificial Intelligence Provides Fast, Accurate and Consistent Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"3772\" class=\"elementor elementor-3772\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-4f80ddb3 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"4f80ddb3\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-306b3d44\" data-id=\"306b3d44\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-c77e4d0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"c77e4d0\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Published in<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0d710b2 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"0d710b2\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><\/p>\n<p>Clinical Neuroradiology, 31(Supplement 1), 41-42. (2021)<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d7cc196 elementor-widget-divider--view-line elementor-widget elementor-widget-divider\" data-id=\"d7cc196\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"divider.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-divider\">\n\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-divider-separator\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-bdcb955 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"bdcb955\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Authors<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-6e9e13a elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"6e9e13a\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><\/p>\n<p>S. W. Hock, D. C. Marterstock, A.-L- Mayer, C. Bettray, K. Huhn, V. Rothhammer, A. D\u00f6rfler, M. Schmidt<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d7217bf elementor-widget-divider--view-line elementor-widget elementor-widget-divider\" data-id=\"d7217bf\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"divider.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-divider\">\n\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-divider-separator\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-91d3115 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"91d3115\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Abstract<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-14708ef3 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"14708ef3\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>Purpose<\/p>\n<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have already had a major impact on medical imaging and opened a wide field of detection of textural and morphological patterns. Aim was to evaluate the potential of latest AI regarding diagnosis and follow-up of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in clinical radiology.<\/p>\n<p>Materials &amp; Methods<\/p>\n<p>We included patients who had undergone MRI at a single academic hospital. MS lesions were evaluated according to McDonald criteria by latest and previous generation AI (Figure 1) and three expert neuroradiologists (gold standard) independently. Following statistical metrics were calculated and compared: Sensitivity (TPR), specificity (TNR), overall accuracy (ACC), false positive rate (FPR) and Dice similarity score (DSC).<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/p>\n<p>A comparison of ANN corroborates the superiority of the latest generation AI compared to the previous generation in detection of MS lesions (Figure 2). Overall sensitivity (77% vs. 29%) and DSC (0.81 vs 0.39) of the latest version AI were significantly higher. In the periventricular compartment TPR (77% vs. 53%), ACC (92% vs. 87%) and DSC (0.8 vs 0.64) were higher, while TNR (96% vs. 96%) and FPR (0.043 vs. 0.041) did not change significantly. In the juxtacortical compartment TPR (62% vs. 0.5%), ACC (95% vs. 90%), FPR (0.018 vs. 0.001) and DSC (0.7 vs 0.01) were higher, while TNR (98% vs. 99%) did not change significantly. In the deep white matter TPR (82% vs. 46%), ACC (82% vs. 62%) and DSC (0.85 vs 0.6) were higher, while TNR (80% vs. 86%) was lower and FPR (0.14 vs. 0.20) did not change significantly. Infratentorial TPR (53% vs. 16%) and DSC (0.69 vs 0.27) were higher, while TNR (99% vs. 99%), ACC (97% vs. 95%) and FPR (0.015 vs. 0.015) did not change significantly.<\/p>\n<p>Discussion<\/p>\n<p>Preliminary data show that the latest generation AI provides consistent, automated, and fully reproducible assessment of MS lesions without being influenced by intra- and\/or interobserver, intrinsic human variability \u2013 especially in the context of longitudinal patient follow-up. Thus, it may aid reliability and standardization in diagnosis and follow-up imaging of MS.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-b36f94d elementor-widget elementor-widget-image\" data-id=\"b36f94d\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"image.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<figure class=\"wp-caption\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"473\" src=\"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/10-Hock-Verlgeich-alte-neue-Laesionsklassifikation-von-mdbrain-1024x606.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-17922\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/10-Hock-Verlgeich-alte-neue-Laesionsklassifikation-von-mdbrain-1024x606.png 1024w, https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/10-Hock-Verlgeich-alte-neue-Laesionsklassifikation-von-mdbrain-300x178.png 300w, https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/10-Hock-Verlgeich-alte-neue-Laesionsklassifikation-von-mdbrain-768x454.png 768w, https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/10-Hock-Verlgeich-alte-neue-Laesionsklassifikation-von-mdbrain-1536x909.png 1536w, https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/10-Hock-Verlgeich-alte-neue-Laesionsklassifikation-von-mdbrain-18x12.png 18w, https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/10-Hock-Verlgeich-alte-neue-Laesionsklassifikation-von-mdbrain.png 2028w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<figcaption class=\"widget-image-caption wp-caption-text\">Improved performance of mdbrain 3.4 vs. 3.1 for lesion segmentation compared to experienced neuroradiologists. Comparison of the performance of mdbrain vs Siemens BrainMorphometry for hippocampal volumetry. At 100% specificity in each case, the sensitivity of mdbrain was far superior to BrainMorphometry (32%) at 96%.<\/figcaption>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figure>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have already had a major impact on medical imaging and opened a wide field of detection of textural and morphological patterns. Aim was to evaluate the potential of latest AI regarding diagnosis and follow-up of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in clinical radiology.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3772","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publications"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3772","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3772"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3772\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21640,"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3772\/revisions\/21640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3772"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3772"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediaire.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}